Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 19:13:16 GMT -8
Apara. lit. a from the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the invocation of cases of relative nullity. . Considering the considerations shown above the Court considers that the provisions of art. in conjunction with those of art. of the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the preliminary chamber and those of art. of the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the relative nullity provides the procedural guarantees specific to the right to defense a fundamental right invoked by the author of the exception in the event of noncompliance with the legal provisions regarding the summons in.
The procedure in the preliminary chamber. Regarding the latter the Court ruled in its Country Email List jurisprudence that the provisions of art. of the Basic Law gives any party involved in a process according to its interests and regardless of the nature of the process the possibility to use all the means provided by law to invoke facts or circumstances in its defense. This right presupposes participation in court hearings the use of evidence the invocation of the exceptions provided by the criminal procedural law the exercise of any other to benefit from the services of a defense attorney see Decision no. of October published in the Official Gazette of.
Romania Part I No. of November paragraph . . For the reasons stated above pursuant to art. lit. d and of art. para. of the Constitution of art. of art. paragraph lit. Ad and of art. of Law no. with unanimity of votes CONSTITUTIONAL COURT In the name of the law DECIDE Rejects as unfounded the exception of unconstitutionality raised by Adrian Gheorghe ult in File no. . of the Buzu Court Criminal Section and notes that the provisions of art. and of art. lit. a from the Code of Criminal Procedure are.
The procedure in the preliminary chamber. Regarding the latter the Court ruled in its Country Email List jurisprudence that the provisions of art. of the Basic Law gives any party involved in a process according to its interests and regardless of the nature of the process the possibility to use all the means provided by law to invoke facts or circumstances in its defense. This right presupposes participation in court hearings the use of evidence the invocation of the exceptions provided by the criminal procedural law the exercise of any other to benefit from the services of a defense attorney see Decision no. of October published in the Official Gazette of.
Romania Part I No. of November paragraph . . For the reasons stated above pursuant to art. lit. d and of art. para. of the Constitution of art. of art. paragraph lit. Ad and of art. of Law no. with unanimity of votes CONSTITUTIONAL COURT In the name of the law DECIDE Rejects as unfounded the exception of unconstitutionality raised by Adrian Gheorghe ult in File no. . of the Buzu Court Criminal Section and notes that the provisions of art. and of art. lit. a from the Code of Criminal Procedure are.